Greed and Capitalism

What kind of society isn't structured on greed? The problem of social organization is how to set up an arrangement under which greed will do the least harm; capitalism is that kind of a system.
- Milton Friedman

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

PAUL KRUGMAN

The Conscience of a Liberal

The Real Trouble With Economics

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Saturday, August 17, 2013

The Downside of Genius

 

Brilliance has its costsThe smartest person in the room may be as insufferable as she is inspiring, and angst-ridden artists may introduce us to brave new ways of thinking.





The Downside of Genius | Psychology Today

Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/collections/201308/the-downside-genius



Penny Stock Fraud


Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for New York, says that where other people saw citizens of the world, the alleged perpetrators of an international penny stock fraud scheme saw only potential marks. (John Minchillo/Associated Press)




Stock fraud scams tough to combat in internet age

Canadians arrested in penny stock scheme that allegedly saw global investors lose $140M


A penny stock fraud scheme that bilked investors in 35 countries out of more than $140 million is raising questions about how authorities can combat such financial scams in the internet age.

Four Canadians carried out the purported fraud with the help of five Americans, the U.S. Department of Justice alleges. One of the Canadians was arrested in Ontario. Another was among six suspects arrested in the U.S., authorities said.

Two other Canadians are being sought in what the department is calling one of the largest international penny stock frauds in history. Authorities say Sandy Winick, 55, remains at large in Thailand and Gregory Curry, 63, has yet to be located.

Paul Davis, a securities lawyer with McMillan in Toronto, said the scale and sophistication of the alleged scam shows how complicated it’s becoming for authorities to combat financial fraud schemes when victims live in many different countries.


“As the Department of Justice and FBI indictment shows, you need the co-operation of regulatory authorities around the world,” he said. “Money’s moving through different accounts, all the way to Lebanon.”

The U.S. attorney’s office says a number of law enforcement and other government agencies in Canada, the U.S. and Britain were involved in the investigation, as well as the U.S. embassies in Bangkok and Beijing. Proceeds from the alleged scheme were funneled through a bank account in Beirut.

According to the indictment filed in court, the defendants used throwaway cellphones and call centres in Thailand and Canada.

Targeting 'citizens of the world'

The penny stocks involved included companies such as Resource Group International, a Wyoming corporation based in Thailand that says it developed a revolutionary fertilizer, and Rain Earth Inc., a Nevada corporation based in Beijing that says it is in the mineral exploration business and developing a specialized fibre, according to prosecutors.

As Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for New York, put it: “Where others looked at the globe and saw citizens of the world, Winick and his co-conspirators saw only potential marks.”

An investigation used wiretaps and video surveillance to uncover the so-called pump and dump scheme.
'You need the co-operation of regulatory authorities around the world. Money’s moving through different accounts, all the way to Lebanon.'—Paul Davis, securities lawyer

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) says that such arrangements typically involve artificially inflating the price of a modestly priced stock by issuing “false or misleading statements.”

The fraudsters eventually sell off the share of the stock they own, reaping profits. However, once they stop issuing false statements about the value of the stock its price typically falls and other investors suffer losses.

Public education campaigns have been touted as one way to help combat pump-and-dump schemes. But Davis says the international nature of the banking and financial industries today make that a tall order.

“It’s not just educating investors in Toronto or Ontario or Canada, because you can have people in Canada or in the U.S. who are perpetrating fraud around the world. So the education part is difficult.”
Alleged fraudsters used social media, emails

Penny stocks are lightly traded and can easily be manipulated through sales pitches to investors and false rumours posted on message boards. Most trade over-the-counter, rather than on major exchanges.

The indictment alleges that the nine people involved in the scheme promoted the stocks through phone calls, artificially inflating their value by promoting them in emails, social media messages and news releases.

Sometimes they would hit their victims a second time, helping them offload the worthless stocks or join lawsuits to reclaim their losses for an advance fee.

Al Rosen, a forensic accountant, says he wasn’t surprised so much by the scale of the alleged fraud, but that Canadian authorities were involved in the investigation.

“We keep on pretending that we’re OK up here, but we’re not. Prosecutions originating in Canada are very few,” he told CBC News.

Rosen says he wants to see Canadian officials centralize information about financial scams so that fraudsters can’t operate the same scam across different jurisdictions.

“We’ve had attempts at a national securities commission but not a national prosecutor, so data is not then collected across the provinces,” he said. “We’ve seen people start in British Columbia, then pull the same dirty trick in Alberta, then they skip over to Ontario and maybe Quebec. It’s the same characters doing the same thing.”With files from The Canadian Press and The Associated Press




CBC News Posted: Aug 15, 2013

Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/08/14/penny-stock-fraud-investigation.html






4 Canadians charged in $140M international penny stock fraud


Five Americans also charged in investigation led by the RCMP and FBI




Last Updated: Aug 14, 2013 1:44 PM ET


A massive penny stock fraud scheme that bilked Canadian and foreign investors of more than $140 million was masterminded by four Canadians and carried out with the help of five Americans, the U.S. Department of Justice said Tuesday.

One of the Canadians was arrested in Ontario and another one was among six suspects arrested in the U.S., authorities said.

Two other Canadians are being sought in what the department is calling one of the largest international penny stock frauds in history.

Gregory Ellis, 46, and Kolt Curry, 38, are in custody but authorities said Sandy Winick, 55, remains at large in Thailand and Gregory Curry, 63, has yet to be located.

Ellis, who lived in Canada at the time of his arrest, acted as president of several of the companies that issued the stocks, according to the indictment.

Sandy Winick, of Stoney Creek, Ont., "orchestrated" the schemes
and had lived in Canada, the U.S., China, Thailand and Vietnam over the years, the document said. He allegedly was recruiting staff to open new call centres to expand the operation in New York City and Toronto.

Gregory Curry helped manage the existing call centres in Canada, Vietnam and Thailand,
where he lived, the document said. He worked with Kolt Curry, who split his time between Canada and Thailand, it said.

The two Curry men — whom the department identified as father and son — also prepared letters and email accounts to promote the con, the indictment said.

'They cheated, lied and swindled investors into buying billions of shares of worthless stock, then turned around and used a second scam to cheat those investors again.'
— U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch

The arrests were the result of a multi-year investigation involving the FBI and the RCMP, the department said, adding it relied on wiretaps in the U.S. and undercover agents abroad. The RCMP declined to comment on the investigation.

The indictment alleges that the defendants were involved in
a massive "pump and dump" scheme — buying controlling interests in sketchy start-up companies, then artificially inflating their value by promoting them in fictitious emails, social media messages and news releases.
The fraudulent sales campaign generated more than $120 million
in investments by tens of thousands of people in the United States, Canada and 33 other countries, authorities said.


Working out of boiler room phone centres in Canada, Thailand and Britain, the defendants again victimized the same investors by convincing them to pay $20 million in advance fees in return for helping them sell their securities or join lawsuits to reclaim their losses, court papers said.


In some cases, it's alleged the accused pretended to work for the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

The list of victims included several hundred Canadians, Justice Department spokesman Zugiel Soto said in an email to The Canadian Press.

"Where others saw citizens of the world, the defendants saw a pool of potential marks," U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch said in a statement.

"They cheated, lied and swindled investors into buying billions of shares of worthless stock, then turned around and used a second scam to cheat those investors again."


Heath Rodgirs, a senior fraud investigator with Prince-Langevin and Associates in Edmonton, said "pump and dump" schemes are very common and penny stocks — which often trade outside the major market exchanges — are particularly vulnerable.

"Because they're so cheap and there's so many of them, it gives a fraudster an opportunity," he said.

"It doesn't take much to set up a company and make it look like something. So just by the nature of penny stocks, there's a greater ability for fraud in it."


One of the companies cited in the indictment, Liquid Gold International Corp.
, was named in a case that came before the Ontario Securities Commission and also involves Winick and both Currys.

The matter was split into two cases, one involving Gregory Curry, Winick, Liquid Gold and another company named BFM Industries Inc.

In a ruling issued last week, the commission found the BFM and Liquid Gold schemes to be "entirely fraudulent."

"The activities of those involved in the schemes include unregistered trading and illegal distributions," OSC adjudicator James D. Carnwath wrote in the decision.

The other file involved Kolt Curry, another person and two companies — one in Ontario and one in Nevada.

An agreed statement of facts in that case found Curry, the other person and the two companies "contravened Ontario securities law" and acted in a way that is "contrary to the public interest."
Sanctions expected

Sanctions in both cases are expected to be laid out later this month and in September.

The American suspects in the penny stocks scheme are Gary Kershner, 72; Joseph Manfredonia, 45; Cort Poyner, 44; Songkram Roy Sahachaisere, 43; and William Seals, 51.

The charges include conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud and false personation of an officer of the United States.


If convicted, the accused could face up to 20 years of imprisonment for each count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and securities fraud, as well as up to five years for conspiracy to commit securities fraud.

The false personation charge could carry a three-year prison sentence.






© The Canadian Press, 2013



Source:  http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/08/14/business-stock-fraud.html



Friday, August 16, 2013

Abbott & Costello Explaining Unemployment


Sounds like Obama-nomics and the obamanation of our country.


Subject:  Abbott & Costello Explaining Unemployment

It would probably be funny if it wasn't all true!

Abbott & Costello Explaining Unemployment

So how can over 873,000 people come off the unemployment rolls when there were only a little over 114,000 jobs created?   Below is a transcript of a conversation between two eminent economists discussing this very question!
  []
COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America . 
ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's 7.8%. 
COSTELLO: That many people are out of work? 
ABBOTT: No, that's 14.7%. 
COSTELLO: You just said 7.8%. 
ABBOTT: 7.8% Unemployed. 
COSTELLO: Right 7.8% out of work. 
ABBOTT: No, that's 14.7%. 
COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 14.7% unemployed. 
ABBOTT: No, that's 7.8%. 
COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 7.8% or 14.7%? 
ABBOTT: 7.8% are unemployed. 14.7% are out of work. 
COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed. 
ABBOTT: No, Congress said you can't count the "Out of Work" as the unemployed.
You have to look for work to be unemployed. 
COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!! 
ABBOTT: No, you miss his point. 
COSTELLO: What point? 
ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work can't be counted with those who look for work.  It wouldn't be fair. 
COSTELLO: To whom? 
ABBOTT: The unemployed. 
COSTELLO: But ALL of them are out of work. 
ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work. Those who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.
COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment roles that would count as less unemployment? 
ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely! 
COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work? 
ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That's how they get it to 7.8%. Otherwise it would be 14.7%. Our govt. doesn't want you to read about 14.7% unemployment.

COSTELLO: That would be tough on those running for reelection.

ABBOTT: Absolutely.

COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number? 
ABBOTT: Two ways is correct. 
COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job? 
ABBOTT: Correct. 
COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job? 
ABBOTT: Bingo. 
COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work. 
ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like an Economist. 
COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said! 
ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like Congress.


Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Mohnish Pabrai IBS Hyperdad July 2013 Lengthy Presentation [VIDEO]



LEGAL DISCLAIMER


Mohnish Pabrai IBS Hyperdad July 2013 Lengthy Presentation [VIDEO]
August 10, 2013By ValueWalk Staff


Mohnish Pabrai gave a presentation at the Indian School of Business Hyderabad earlier in July. The lengthy presentation (about 100 minutes long) is now all on video so make sure to check it out, also read Mohnish’s book, The Dhandho Investor: The Low – Risk Value Method to High Returns


The fund manager he talks to periodically (based on Charlie Munger’s advice) is Guy Spier.

Full Mohnish Pabrai video below

'Get ValueWalk's Daily Edition By Email and Never Miss Our Top Stories'  And Follow Us 

Friday, July 26, 2013

Facebook Chart

Stevie Cohen vs SEC


TRADING

 
The SEC’s important case against Stevie Cohen
By Felix Salmon

Stevie Cohen is one of the greatest stock-market traders of all time. Indeed, there’s a strong case to be made that he’s the greatest. Cohen is not the greatest investor — he doesn’t really go in for buy-and-hold positions which steadily accumulate enormous value over decades. He’s not even the greatest hedge-fund manager: he doesn’t go in for the big macro bets (Soros vs. the pound, Paulson vs. mortgage-backed securities) which are the stuff of legend. Instead, he’s a trader, and while normal people pretty much understand what someone like Warren Buffett does, or what someone like John Paulson does, it’s much harder to understand what a trader does, or what differentiates a good trader from a bad trader.

Trading isn’t usually about making bets, and then cashing them in when things go as you thought they would. It’s more about understanding probabilities, seeing when securities are mispriced, taking advantage of fleeting arbitrage opportunities, being paid for providing liquidity to the markets (selling when others are buying, buying when others are selling), and, most importantly, “reading the tape” — understanding the way that money is flowing around the market, and how those flows are going to manifest themselves in securities prices.

Being a great trader is hard work: you’ve got to be constantly aware of subtle price actions in dozens of different markets and thousands of different securities. (Jim Cramer is a great example of a trader: he doesn’t have a deep understanding of any particular stock, but he knows where thousands of them are trading, and how their movements relate to each other.) What’s more, trading is hard to scale effectively. You need to be a certain minimum size in order to be effective, but there’s a maximum size too: you have to be able to get in and out of positions without moving the market so much in doing so that you end up erasing all of your profits.

Being a great trader is also increasingly difficult. 30 years ago, for instance, you could make surprisingly good money with very, very basic strategies. You could buy convertible bonds at issue, for instance, and hedge by shorting the underlying stock; or, even more simply, you could just pick a set of stocks and buy consistently at the bid while selling consistently at the ask. The buyers and sellers would pretty much cancel each other out, and you’d pocket the bid-ask spread, which, in the years before decimalization, was often substantial.

Today, however, all of those strategies have been arbitraged away by algorithms, and the result is that markets are faster and more treacherous than ever. Strategies which seem as though they’re work very well often have enormous and unforeseeable fat tails: look at the monster losses during the quant meltdown of 2007, for instance, or JP Morgan’s crazy London Whale trade.

And yet there’s still one thing which can scale, and which will never be competed away by algorithms, and where the upside is much larger than the downside: black edge.

Cohen has never been easy to invest with. He deliberately charges some of the highest fees in the industry — his 3-and-50 makes the standard 2-and-20 seem downright generous. And even then it has historically been very hard to get him to agree to manage your money. Cohen makes his fund inaccessible for a reason: he knows how hard it is to scale the astonishing results he’s been posting, year after year, and that at the margin, the bigger he gets, the lower the returns he’s likely to see.

But at the same time, there’s no way that he can run a $15 billion trading book on his own. He has roughly 1,000 employees, of which about 300 are investment professionals. And if you’re one of those professionals, you have one of the hardest jobs in the business.

The way that SAC works is that Cohen gives his individual traders, and teams, their own trading accounts, with millions or billions of dollars: the traders who make the most money get the biggest allocations. Traders get paid a percentage of the profits they make, which makes them compete against each other: in order to be successful at SAC it isn’t good enough to make good profits. Instead, you have to make better profits than any of the other traders — who themselves are some of the best in the business. If you can’t do that, you get fired. If you can do that, you get to manage ever-increasing amounts of money — plus, Cohen will mirror your positions in his own account, the largest at the firm, giving you a shot at extra profits over and above the ones generated by your own positions. In the immortal words of David Mamet, first prize is a Cadillac El Dorado. Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you’re fired.

While Cohen does still generate his own ideas, then, most of the time he outsources that function to his employees. There’s a relatively static allocation of capital between the various traders, but then there’s a dynamic overlay as well: Cohen “tags” the positions in his own account with the names of the traders whose trades they are, thereby giving every trader the opportunity to see his positions multiplied in size at any time. While his traders are moving money in and out of stocks, Cohen can be thought of moving his money in and out of his own traders’ positions. He’s not betting on stocks so much as he’s betting on individual employees, in one big zero-sum game.

As such, Cohen is much more than a simple employer/supervisor. He’s constantly sending clear and public messages to his traders, about what he likes, what he approves of, and what he disapproves of — and he’s sending those messages in the most unambiguous way possible, in the form of extraordinarily large sums of money. If he wanted to, he could withhold money, and even employment, from anybody who was working with black edge. Alternatively, he could manufacture a spurious layer of deniability, while actively encouraging, in terms of financial incentives, the one kind of trade which has the very best risk-adjusted returns.

The SEC’s decision to charge Cohen with failing to supervise his employees is, yes, a clever way to try to put together the most winnable case before the statute of limitations runs out. But it’s also a serious charge which goes straight to the main way in which Cohen makes his money. Cohen’s returns come directly from the way that he supervises and incentivizes his employees, and once you’ve read the complaint, it’s pretty clear that Cohen loves any trade which makes money, and has no particular compunctions when it comes to whether or not the trader in question is behaving in an entirely legal manner.

It’ll be interesting to see Cohen’s defense to these charges, but he has an uphill task ahead of him — especially given that the hearing will be held in front of the SEC’s own judge. The SEC has home-field advantage, here, while Cohen oversees a firm which has seen four different traders already plead guilty to criminal insider-trading charges. It’s good that the SEC has finally managed to charge Cohen personally, rather than just his traders. The only pity is that we’re still a long way from a criminal case. That might yet come, but I’m not holding my breath.







Source:  http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/07/21/the-secs-important-case-against-stevie-cohen/





HOPE YOU LIKE CLUB FED

 

SAC to Be Hit With Indictment

Mark Lennihan/AP

Cohen likely won’t be charged.

Those trips to the Hamptons must be pretty tense for SAC Capitol Advisors. Federal authorities are reportedly ready to file a criminal indictment against Steven Cohen’s hedge fund for insider trading in the coming days, according to the New York Times. Cohen himself is not likely to be charged, sources said. But still, the charges will cripple SAC, which has been under investigation for a decade. The Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil action last week accusing Cohen of failing to supervise employees accused of insider trading, Mathew Martoma and Michael C. Steinberg, who have now been charged with criminal wrongdoing. Criminal charges against companies is fairly rare—and when the Justice Department filed charges against Enron’s accounting firm Arthur Andersen, the firm was forced to close, and 28,000 people lost their jobs.

Read it at DealBook

SAC Capital

SACKED

The Fallout From SAC
 
by Filipa Ioannou Jul 25, 2013



Seth Wenig/AP

SAC Capital, the giant hedge fund, faces an existential threat after its indictment. But the economic impact of its legal saga extends far beyond its Stamford, Connecticut, headquarters.

SAC Capital, the hedge fund controlled by billionaire Steven A. Cohen, was indicted Thursday for securities fraud and wire fraud. The blow from the feds was the latest in a string of legal assaults the hedge fund has faced; in March, the firm paid $616 million to settle two insider trading suits brought by the SEC, a record insider-trading fine. But the government isn’t through with SAC yet. It is pursuing forfeiture of about $10 billion, The Wall Street Journal reported.


Thursday, July 25, 2013

Tech More: Features Computer Security Hackers LulzSec The 13 Most Notorious Alleged Criminals In Tech History Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-worst-tech-criminals

poker company

Raymond Bitar was CEO of Full Tilt Poker, an online poker company that was able to process its illegal revenue by funneling it through shell companies that appeared legitimate. 
In 2011, he was charged with illegal online gambling and faced up to 35 years in prison. As Bernard Vaughan at Reuters reported earlier this year, Bitar was able to receive no jail time after pleading guilty due to a severe heart condition (which requires him to wear a defibrillator under his clothes), but was ordered to forfeit $40 million.




tech-criminals-2013-7?op=1#ixzz2a37herQd