Greed and Capitalism

What kind of society isn't structured on greed? The problem of social organization is how to set up an arrangement under which greed will do the least harm; capitalism is that kind of a system.
- Milton Friedman

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Quotes


"A brand for a company is like a reputation for a person. You earn reputation by trying to do hard things well." - Jeff Bezos


 "Culture eats strategy for breakfast" -Peter Drucker


The customer comes first, last, and always.-Harvey MacKay


Shoot for the moon and if you miss you will land among the stars. – Les Brown


Do not wait to strike until the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking - William B. Sprague


If you’re not prepared to be wrong, you’ll never come up with anything original. – Sir Ken Robinson



The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter. - Mark Twain




If you are not willing to risk the unusual, you will have to settle for the ordinary. – Jim Rohn 




The very essence of leadership is that you have to have vision. You can’t blow an uncertain trumpet. 
– Theodore M. Hesburgh



Everything started as nothing. – Ben Weissenstein


Innovation is creativity with a job to do. – John Emmerling

Sometimes when you innovate you make mistakes. It's best to admit them quickly & get on with improving your other innovations. – Steve Jobs


If you’re not in an uncomfortable situation every single day, then you’re doing something wrong. 
– Lauren Amarante


Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently. – Henry Ford


We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give.- Winston Churchill


Stay hungry. Stay Foolish. - Steve Jobs


















Goldman Banker Probed for Alleged Leaks to Galleon

Goldman is being treated like a whipping boy and there is seldom anything "nice" being said about the venerable firm.  It is difficult to see how they can defend many of their practices that have been exposed - mistreating some clients to make money for favored clients.  Has Goldman been singled out or are these practices widespread among all the Wall Street firms?

Goldman Banker Probed for Alleged Leaks to Galleon - WSJ.com

BY MICHAEL ROTHFELD AND REED ALBERGOTTI


Investigations are deepening into the potential involvement of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. employees in the high-profile Galleon Group insider-trading ring.

Rumor has it:
U.S. prosecutors and securities regulators are investigating whether a senior Goldman investment banker gave Galleon hedge-fund traders advance word of pending health-care deals...

The banker, whom the people identified as Matthew Korenberg, is a San Francisco-based managing director for Goldman, a senior post.

 Source:
 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304811304577368070832086652.html

 ...........................................................................................................
 

This is a more colorful take on the failure to treat clients equally... in fact playing clients against each other.


Goldman 'Clients': Only Some Are Muppets
  -  By Dan Freed


Since "the word 'client' has become Orwellian doublespeak.  
Goldman's leaders talk uniformly about the importance of serving clients, 
but the firm's salespeople know who is a client and who is a mere a counter-party." 

Galleon was a real client. 

The 'muppets' Smith's managing directors were e-mailing each other about 
were fake clients or, as Partnoy put it, "fellow gamblers around a poker table". 

Goldman will ensure that the rules of the game are accurately described - the financial equivalent of checking to be sure there are 52 cards in the deck. 

But it is not obliged to act in a disadvantaged counter-party's best interests, any more than a savvy poker player is obliged to show a poor player his good cards." 


 When in doubt, it is generally safe to assume Goldman is up to no good



Source:
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11511323/1/goldman-clients-only-some-are-muppets.html



America Decline is an opinion formed by extrapolating the past bad new forward and is not necessarily so. Ritholtz |

 This video is worth watching and listening to, if you need a lift from all the gloom and doom in the financial news.  It is easy to get optimistic after spending time with young entrepreneurs and all the Blue Sky predictions they make.  Maybe he is more optimistic than economic reality would suggest he should be.  Where is the growth in the ECONOMY AND THE JOB CREATION needed to get the mainstream of Americans back to work and wanting to spend again?

America Is So Not In Decline: Ritholtz | Daily Ticker - Yahoo! Finance

 
After five years of financial crisis followed by economic frustration, many Americans are starting to believe that the country's best years are behind it and that we're starting a long, slow decline.

Balderdash, says Barry Ritholtz, the writer of the Big Picture and a fund manager at Fusion IQ.

It's true that America's in the middle of a stagnant economic decade, Ritholtz says, and the lousy growth will probably continue for the next 5 years. That's how long it takes countries to work through the aftermath of a debt-binge and financial crisis like the one we just had. And the U.S. isn't going to find a miracle cure, no matter what the politicians say. (he seems to be contradicting himself here?  Where's the optimism in that...?)

But longer term, America's still in great shape, Ritholtz says.

Unlike Japan, which has wallowed in economic misery for more than two decades since its own real-estate bubble burst, the U.S. economy is still the most dynamic and innovative in the world.

If you want a vivid demonstration of that, Ritholtz says, just visit Silicon Valley, which is leading the world in tech innovation.

Ritholtz just returned from one of the dozens of tech conferences each year that feature hot tech start-ups, and he says he was very impressed by what he saw. (He sounds like he is in the ether and may be giddy and in a few days, he will get back down to earth.)


Source:
 http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/america-not-decline-ritholtz-122217030.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DailyTickerRss+%28Yahoo!+Finance%3A+The+Daily+Ticker%29

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Acorda News Release | Acorda.com

Acorda News Release | Acorda.com


Acorda Therapeutics Presents Preclinical Data Showing Dalfampridine Improves Motor Function in Chronic Stroke

  • First ever data to demonstrate improvement in motor function following stroke with oral drug treatment initiated several weeks after event
HAWTHORNE, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 3, 2012-- Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: ACOR) presented data showing that treatment with dalfampridine improved motor function in a preclinical model of stroke, with treatment initiated at least four weeks following the ischemic event. These data were presented on February 2 at the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association International Stroke Conference in New Orleans, LA. Dalfampridine, also known as 4-aminopyridine, is the active chemical ingredient in AMPYRA® (dalfampridine) Extended Release Tablets, 10 mg.
“These are the first preclinical data to show an oral pharmacologic treatment can improve function in chronic, or long term, stroke. We are excited by these results and plan to begin proof-of-concept human clinical trials of AMPYRA in people with chronic stroke later this year,” said Andrew R. Blight, Ph.D., Acorda Therapeutics’ Chief Scientific Officer. “The majority of the nearly seven million people in the United States who live with the long term effects of a stroke have motor function deficits, such as walking impairment, but there are no established treatments other than physical therapy to address these impairments.”
A late-breaking science presentation, entitled “Dalfampridine Improves Sensorimotor Function in Rats with Chronic Deficits Following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion,” presented by Acorda scientist Jennifer Iaci, reviewed data from three study groups that received treatment beginning four weeks after a permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). The neurological impairments that result are expected to be permanent by four weeks, which represents the chronic stage of stroke. Each group received three treatment phases over the course of the study: high and low doses of dalfampridine, and placebo. The order of the treatment phases was different for each group, with a 10 day washout period between each phase.
Researchers assessed functional improvement using a battery of standard motor function tests in both the forelimbs and hind limbs. In each of the three study groups, treatment with dalfampridine resulted in significant improvement in function compared to placebo across all measures during the respective treatment periods. Improvements in the high dose phase were consistently better than those seen in the low dose phase.
“In addition to the seven million Americans living with the consequences of a prior stroke, there are close to 800,000 people in the United States who have new stroke events each year. The resulting disability has a major impact on the person who suffers the stroke as well as on their caregivers, and places a significant burden on the healthcare system,” said Seth Finklestein, M.D., Chairman and Chief Scientific Officer of Biotrofix, a preclinical research organization that conducted research for this study in partnership with Acorda. “These are the first data from a well-controlled preclinical study that have demonstrated improvement in motor function related to walking and upper body movement. Developing a therapeutic option that can improve function would represent a potential major advance in the standard of care for stroke survivors.”
Acorda plans to begin a proof-of-concept trial of AMPYRA in stroke by the end of 2012. This study will evaluate the use of AMPYRA in stroke patients with chronic neurologic deficits, including walking impairment.
AMPYRA is approved in the United States as a treatment to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This was demonstrated by an improvement in walking speed. AMPYRA is known as prolonged-, modified-, or sustained-release fampridine (FAMPYRA®) in some countries outside the United States. 



About Acorda Therapeutics
Acorda Therapeutics is a biotechnology company focused on developing therapies that restore function and improve the lives of people with MS, spinal cord injury and other neurological conditions.
Acorda markets AMPYRA® (dalfampridine) Extended Release Tablets, 10 mg, in the United States as a treatment to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This was demonstrated by an improvement in walking speed. AMPYRA is marketed outside the United States as FAMPYRA® (prolonged-release fampridine tablets) by Biogen Idec under a licensing agreement from Acorda. AMPYRA and FAMPYRA are sold under a license from Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited and manufactured by Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited and other parties.
The Company also markets ZANAFLEX CAPSULES® (tizanidine hydrochloride) and Zanaflex tablets, a short-acting drug for the management of spasticity.
Acorda is developing an industry-leading pipeline of novel neurological therapies. The Company is studying AMPYRA to improve a range of functional impairments caused by MS, as well as its use in other neurological conditions, including cerebral palsy and chronic stroke. In addition, Acorda is developing clinical stage compounds AC105 for acute treatment of spinal cord injury and GGF2 for treatment of heart failure. GGF2 is also being investigated in preclinical studies as a treatment for neurological conditions such as stroke and spinal cord injury. Additional preclinical programs include rHIgM22, a remyelinating monoclonal antibody for the treatment of MS, and chondroitinase, an enzyme that encourages nerve plasticity in spinal cord injury.


Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Natural Gas Prices DOWN to "bargain basement" levels???

The Chart for Natural Gas looks like a disaster zone...
When and why does a market like this turn around? 

Professor Mark J. Perry -  Economics and Finance Blogger

Monday, April 23, 2012


Speculators Are Driving Natural Gas Prices DOWN, Not Up, Reflecting Market Forces: Supply, Demand
















 Prices for June 2012 natural gas futures contracts on the CME, which have fallen from about $5 per million BTUs to $2 over the last year. 

Commodity prices in both the spot market and futures market are ultimately determined by the twin market forces of supply and demand, and cannot easily be manipulated to deviate from the overwhelming, natural and powerful forces of market fundamentals.

When natural gas prices are falling, it's a sure bet that increases in supply and/or decreases in demand, e.g. due to mild weather, are responsible.  When oil prices are rising, it's a sure bet that decreases or potential disruptions in supply and/or rising demand are responsible.  If speculators bet against market forces and the direction of prices resulting from those forces, it's likely they'll get punished with losses.

On the other hand, if they correctly predict the pending effects of market forces on future price changes in oil or gas ahead of other traders, they could be rewarded with gains; but it's because they're betting on the market, not against market forces.


The St. Louis Fed says speculators jacked up oil prices 15 percent in the 2008 run-up.


"However, speculation significantly contributed to the oil price increase between 2004 and 2008. Our analysis pins down the start of speculative forces driving oil prices in 2004, which is when significant investment started to flow into commodity markets. 

We find that the decline in the real price of oil in late 2008 is driven mainly by the negative global demand shock associated with the recession after the Financial crisis. 

However, we note that the speculative shock also played a significant role in the decline as the financial crisis eroded the balance sheets of many Financial institutions, which in turn affected their demand for commodity assets in their portfolio, consequently pushing prices down."
 

Canadian Venture Exchange (CDNX)

Canadian Venture Exchange (CDNX)


Canadian Venture Exchange (CDNX)

The Canadian Venture Exchange (CDNX) was formed in late 1999 through the merging of the junior exchanges in Canada, i.e. the Vancouver stock Exchange, the Alberta stock Exchange, and various "parts" of the other, more senior exchanges (the Toronto stock Exchange and the Montreal stock Exchange) as well as the CDN, Canadian Dealing Network (which really isn't a stock exchange but is more like the OTC-BB in the USA, i.e. a market for "unlisted" stocks). The vision for the CDNX was to be the exchange for venture (i.e. young, emerging) companies. The CDNX listed (in 3 different categories) smaller, emerging companies such as junior technology ventures. In early 2002, the Toronto stock Exchange (TSX) acquired the CDNX and renamed it the tsx-v, for tsx-venture Exchange, with its head office in Toronto. 

 

Vancouver Stock Exchange (VSE)

The Vancouver stock exchange (VSE) was one of Canada's junior company stock exchanges. On March 15, 1999, the VSE and the ASE (Alberta stock Exchange) agreed to merge and form the CDNX - the Canadian Venture Exchange - which will also take on some junior Toronto and Montreal Exchange companies. The VSE got a bad reputation in the 80's due to many unscrupulous scam artists manipulating VSE listed companies. New regulatory controls and surveillance systems which had been implemented on the VSE were transferred to the new CDNX. In 2002, the CDNX became the tsx-v.


TSX Venture Exchange 

 http://www.tmx.com/en/listings/venture_issuer_resources/finance_manual.html

 

Monday, April 23, 2012

Investing in Renewable Energy

 This article is presented here as a good synopsis of the 'players' in the public company realm of enterprises managing renewable energy projects. This article is presented here as a good synopsis of the 'players' in the public company realm of enterprises managing renewable energy projects.

 

The future must entail clean, renewable energy.   There are only a few alternatives to the hydrocarbon-based energy:  Solar energy, Bio-fuels, Geothermal energy, Hydro-power, and Wind energy


In each sector, there are good companies to consider.


1. Solar Power.  

Warren Buffett's investmented in two utility-scale solar projects supplied by First Solar (FSLR).

Falling solar panel prices also bode well for consumers as widespread acceptance and increasing affordability have increased the industry's demand and long-term future. First Solar remains one of the few viable investments in this sector, with its industry-leading margins that have kept the company profitable throughout the crisis.

2. Biofuels. 

The industry is trying to shake off the negative image of unsustainable ethanol.

 Innovative and proven second generation technology exist but is struggling remains to raise capital and gain public acceptance.  Capital investment is needed to bring commercial scale production capacity online.

Most advanced in this area is Solazyme (SZYM), which utilizes algae-based technology to convert non-food sources into renewable oil equivalents, chemicals, food and even cosmetics.

One company providing sustainable ethanol is Cosan (CZZ), a Brazilian-based sugar company leading in ethanol production capacity and distribution capabilities.  American ethanol subsidies have come to an end so Brazilian-based ethanol companies may continue to outshine their counterparts in America.



3. Geothermal Energy. 

Geothermal is a comparatively small industry.  . Yet is one of the more stable prospects.

Ormat Technologies (ORA).  founded 1965 is the only vertically integrated provider of geothermal energy.


4. Hydropower. 

Hydropower is a stable and longstanding  industry.  Hydropower companies tend be utility companies  requiring large longterm capital expenditures  to build a dams and other infrastructure..

Brazil remains one of the greatest developers of hydropower with its vast river resources, abundant rains, and lack of alternatives when it comes to energy sources.

Centrais Electricas Brasileiras (EBR), - Electrobras, operates 29 hydroelectric plants throughout Brazil. The company is diversified into thermal, coal and oil power generation units,


5. Wind Energy. 

The wind industry is dominated by China, which dethroned the United States in 2010 as the largest wind power installer.  

General Electric (GE) or Siemens (SI), neither of which are pure plays..

China Ming Yang Power Group (MY), trading on the NYSE since 2010, is the largest non-state owned wind turbine manufacturer in China.

The company has encountered rising expenses and difficulties including weather related interruption to installations.

Management has initiated a share repurchase program for $50 million, company market capitalization of $359 million as of January 23, 2012.



Saturday, April 21, 2012

Former Goldman trader schools the Muppets

 The former Goldman trader may not work for them anymore but he kept his wily instincts for a buck earned by cleverness and being on the inside track.

Commentary: Deck stacked against them, retail traders seek magic ticket


‘It’s shocking how little retail investors know.’
Anton Kreil
Former Goldman trader schools the muppets - Shawn Langlois's London Sketch - MarketWatch


LONDON (MarketWatch) — Anton Kreil  Kings College  two-hour trading seminar. 
 the path to financial success 

When someone tells me about shortcuts to big money and “can’t lose” trading strategies, I generally shunt him or her into the corner of my brain that houses the likes of L. Ron Hubbard and Donald Trump. 
 Prepared to, at best, be entertained, and, at worst, to be slapped in the face with the greed, hubris and unethical behavior wafting through Wall Street and the City....

Kreil started his talk with — what else? — a video of his astronaut training, “Top Gun”–style. So far, so strange. Pilot jumpsuits, rock music, footage from inside the cockpit, Kreil doing his Maverick impersonation.


As for his relevant skill set, Kreil got started early, trading his own account as a teenager until Goldman Sachs gave him a desk. He then made his way through various positions at Lehman and J.P. Morgan before bailing out and going on one of those soul-searching trips around the world. All before turning 30.


He’s out on his own now, coming off a star turn in the 2009 BBC miniseries “Million Dollar Traders,” in which rookie traders were given a million dollars with the aim of beating the professionals. They did. 


After some idle banter about g-force and world records, he launched right into the meat of his seminar: 

Day trading doesn’t work. It’s “the big dupe” perpetrated by brokers. They make money, you lose money. 

It’s the 90/90/90 rule: 90% of you will lose 90% of your money within 90 days. 
The brokers and trading desks get paid no matter what. At this point, I was waiting to hear this: “Lucky for you, I’m different. And here’s why!”

Over the next 90 minutes, Kreil dropped some insightful glimpses into how the brokerages view their “muppets” (yes, he used the word) and how woefully misguided the retail, private trader is.
Lambs to the slaughter.
“Brokers just want to churn the [bleep] out of you until you blow up,” he said. “It’s shocking how little retail investors know.”

He has compiled decades’ worth of statistics to support the argument that the whole system is rigged against the average Joe from the start. Filtering out the nonsense and overhauling the prevailing mind-set is the only way to survive and build the balance sheet.


Among his many tips, he urged attendees not to get bogged down with technology. It’s just a distraction. Forget the blinking lights and the siren song of your trading terminal. And, for the love of all that is holy, forsake those handheld devices.
“Steve Jobs wasn’t a genius because he gave us the iPhone; he was a genius because he understood humans,” he said. “He legalized crack and put it in your hand.” As Kreil turned away, I slid my 4S under a notepad.
Kreil’s overarching point was that the little guy needs to think more like the big guy — there’s really no magic sauce. Contrary to popular opinion, the folks at Goldman and J.P. Morgan aren’t smarter than anybody in this room, he pandered. Like Kreil, himself, they just found a way inside.
In fact, Goldman’s senior investment strategist, Abby Joseph Cohen, is “the worst trader I’ve ever come across,” he said. “She’s top-ticked every bull market for the past 20 years.” 
Ignore the analysts. The media. It’s all a bunch of political maneuvering inside those walls, anyway, he said.
Without going into too much detail, Kreil explained that day trading is but a small part of a hedge fund’s strategy. Rather, the pros put together diversified portfolios of shorts and longs with horizons of one to three months. Avoiding losses is the priority. 
“Of course there are bad hedge funds, and there are crooks, but, excluding this tiny minority, the outcome of most hedge funds is, first, capital preservation and, then, growth,” he said.

“For independent traders, the outcome of day trading is capital destruction.” 

Why? At the risk of oversimplifying matters, the market is a “sleeping beast” 75% of the time, he said.  Intraday trading during these sessions is a fool’s game. The good hedge funds aren’t doing it, so why are you?
 
But when volatility picks up, the seasoned vets reduce their exposure in their medium-range portfolios by raising cash. Only then do they start “punting” the market. In other words, when the wild swings are there, so is the smart money, setting targets and stops, appropriately.
Kreil aptly compared it to counting cards at a blackjack table. When the odds tilt in your favor, have a go. When the count says otherwise, bide your time. Until you get caught, of course. Then it’s on to the next casino.
After two hours, it was finally time for the big payoff. The kicker. A step-by-step guide to riches. The whole reason this group had come to the bowels of Kings College in the first place.
How can we be more like you, Anton?
The answer: Come to the next session. This time it’ll cost you.
Fair enough. This is London, and even a Goldman Sachs alumnus has to eat.

Shawn Langlois is an editor and columnist for MarketWatch in London.


Disney
Those other Muppets.

The Online Ben Graham - Barrons.com

The Online Ben Graham - Barrons.com


The Online Ben Graham - Barrons.com




What value investor doesn't like Benjamin Graham? He's famous worldwide, with his strategies and tactics imitated by some of investing's best-known names.

Investment Maxim (www.investmentmaxim.com) is the latest service to offer individuals an opportunity to view the market as he would.

Based in India, Investment Maxim has a more international flare than similar valuation services—GuruFocus (www.gurufocus.com), YCharts (www.ycharts.com) and Validea (www.validea.com)—because, unlike those sites, much of its data come from foreign exchanges.

THE VISITOR CHOOSES FROM among five strategies from Graham, 10 from other gurus, four of Investment Maxim's own design, and two very general technical screens. A rather unusual "Score Board" feature will cross-reference a particular strategy's o output against other experts' approaches to see just how steeped in Grahamism they are.


Free registration provides access to preconfigured screeners that serve up a dozen or more prospects, based on the investing styles of Warren Buffett, David Dreman of Dreman Value Management and former Fidelity Investments manager Peter Lynch, with a few parameters that define the strategy. For example, output for Peter Lynch's growth at a reasonable price, or GARP, strategy includes the average earnings-per-share growth rate, debt-to-equity ratio and PEG (price/earnings to growth) ratio.

A $175-a-year subscription permits unfettered access to all strategies, screeners, the portfolio manager and data from five international-exchange indexes—the S&P 500, Toronto's S&P/TSX, the U.K.'s FTSE 100 and India's Nifty50 and CNX100.

However, the only U.S. stocks covered here are the 500 in the S&P, which accounts for about three-fourths of American stock-market capitalization.

In contrast, Validea includes data on 6,500 U.S. tickers for its $270 annual subscription price, while GuruFocus maintains a database of 8,700 stocks, including some in the pink sheets, for $289 a year. YCharts delivers 10 years of stock history on more than 5,000 issues for $384 a year.
Long story short, Investment Maxim has an international tilt, applying valuation analysis to overseas markets that have been garnering increased interest from U.S. investors lately.

The first Graham strategy, Net Current Asset Bargains, is something of a model for the other four. Its awkward name aside, NCA is a simple concept that could be summed up as "Never pay retail."
Specifically, it counsels paying less for a stock than the value of its net current assets alone. Graham determined these by focusing on the sum of cash, short-term investments, three-fourths of accounts receivable, and half of inventory less total liabilities.

An Investment Maxim screen uses this approach in identifying the top 20 prospects from each of five international indexes. However, the site is a little underpowered when it comes to tracking these picks. Its portfolio manager has room for little more than the most basic metrics, and is definitely not a place from which to manage sizable and varied holdings, versus Personal Capital's (www.personalcapital.com) portfolio manager.

Investment Maxim's company dashboard offers a drill-down function that serves up key metrics for a stock, but there's no way to add them to the portfolio manager.

SUBSCRIBERS ARE LIMITED TO only five portfolios of 10 tickers each—a reasonable number for most folks, but a low ceiling for advanced investors who keep multiple watch lists. If you want to see a really good online portfolio manager, check out Wikinvest (www.wikinvest.com).


Although the Investment Maxim Website is a bit spare, that quality can be a plus for investors who know what they want to do and are looking for offshore data. It's also not a bad place for new investors to get the short course on valuation analysis.


E-mail: mike@mikhogan.com

Friday, April 20, 2012

Aura Minerals is making new low share prices


This blog has been following Aura Minerals as a 'real world' case study of an intermediate mining company. They have properties in the development stages and other properties are in production.

The company literature sounds very positive but the falling stock price might be saying people are losing faith in the prospects for Aura.

Today's volume was relatively high compared to the average daily volume.

 

 

News: Aura Minerals Inc (ORA.TO)

ORA.TO on Toronto Stock Exchange

0.75CAD
3:59pm EDT
Price Change (% chg)

$-0.05 (-6.25%)
Prev Close
$0.80
Open
$0.85
Day's High
$0.87
Day's Low
$0.74
Volume
419,802
Avg. Vol
78,345
52-wk High
$3.12
52-wk Low
$0.80

This Detail From Chipotle's Earnings Call Is HUGE For The Company's Future - Business Insider

This Detail From Chipotle's Earnings Call Is HUGE For The Company's Future - Business Insider

 Wall Street is buzzing about Chipotle's monster first quarter, which was driven by a 12.7 percent jump in same-store sales.

They're officially the hottest burrito chain, if not the hottest fast-food chain, in America.

The stock is up a whopping 400 percent in the last 3 years.  And now everyone wants to know, which company could be the next Chipotle.

Deutsche Bank's Jason West: Maintain Buy: West has $480 price target for CMG.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Spain Jolts Global Markets - WSJ.com

Spain Jolts Global Markets - WSJ.com


Fresh signs of stress among Spanish banks sent shudders through European markets on Friday and helped push U.S. stocks to their worst week this year.
New data showed Spanish bank borrowing from the European Central Bank surged to new highs in March. The report was seen as an indicator that skittish international investors had left Spain and its banks to rely on ECB funding, at a time when concerns were mounting over the country's ailing finances.
Those worries combined with broader concerns about the world economy, sparked by softer-than-expected Chinese growth, to produce a miserable day in global markets.
Investors ...


Copper Futures End Flat - WSJ.com

Copper Futures End Flat - WSJ.com


NEW YORK—Copper prices ended unchanged as a weaker dollar counterbalanced the damping impact of China's central bank raising its benchmark interest rates.
The most actively traded contract, for March delivery, settled at $4.5740 per pound, down 0.1 cent, on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. The thinly traded February-delivery contract settled nearly unchanged at $4.5680 per pound, up 0.05 cent.
Copper prices rallied alongside the euro in late-morning trade. The euro was recently at $1.3648, up from $1.3583 late Monday.
"As copper has been heading up, the dollar has been heading down, and ...

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Bullish Strategists

This article caught my attention because it exposes the idea of self-fulfilling prophecies in the stock market and group think.  

It also demonstrates how differently various points of view interpret the same technical indicators. 

The following article is included for education purposes only.

Bullish Strategists Are Betting On This Huge Blue Bar - Business Insider

Bullish Strategists Are Betting On This Huge Blue Bar
Despite some recent selling, stocks are way up from their October lows.  Specifically, they're up 20 percent in the last six months.

And stocks have far outperformed bonds.  This is important because when this happens, the relative weight of an investor's portfolio tilts towards stocks.  As a result, investors often have to sell stocks in order to re-balance their portfolio to get back to their long-term, strategic asset allocations.
However, big investors don't plan on doing any selling.


chart
Citi Investment Research & Analysis

 
Intentions To Buy Stocks

 Citigroup recently surveyed 115 fund manager clients.


"Fascinatingly, despite the gains thus far this year and the very modest upside to the aggregated target overall, more than 80% want to allocate additional money towards equities, with US equities leading the charge," said Citigroup's Tobias Levkovich.


The hunger for stocks might not actually be too fascinating if fund managers are already underweight stocks.  JP Morgan's Tom Lee recently discussed this with Bloomberg's Carol Massar.


"Something that's been puzzling about this rally that started in March '09 is that the public hasn't really participated," said . "They pulled $300 billion out of the equity markets over the last three years.  And trading volumes have been low, which means the institutions haven't really been participating in this rally either.  Institutional volumes actually continue to shrink."

Low Volume
Low volume is often interpreted as a lack of confirmation – a bearish signal.
But some strategists have pointed to low volume as an opportunity.

"While many bears cite the lack of daily trading volume as a sign that the market lacks real conviction about these positive signs, it can also be argued that this reflects just how many investors have abandoned the equity culture and can still return," said Jim O'Neill, Chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.
In other words, low trading volumes also means there is cash on the sidelines, or that investors have the capacity to buy stocks.
So if Citi's survey participants put their money where their mouth is, then the huge blue bar in the chart mean that "confirmation" will come in a big bullish way.

Greg Smith, Goldman Sachs, Occupy Wall Street, Civil Disobedience

A Lesson in Defection From Goldman Sachs - the climax of just about every story of effective civil resistance is the moment of defection
 The defection of Greg Smith from Goldman Sachs has become one more public relations nightmare for the venerable firm.  This article is interesting because it points out how Smith's concern did not match the Occupy Wall Street movement's primary concerns but he put a chink in the armour of the firm and opened some practices to scrutiny which furthers the cause of change.


"If you want to get an institution to eat itself alive, don’t just denounce it altogether. Instead, find ways to make its most committed and loyal members consider whether the institution really lives up to its own cherished values, and let them do their thing. They’re the ones who can stir up far more trouble with far less effort than anyone on the outside ever could."

Getting people within the organization to question the business values and ethics they have routinely and blindly applied in their dealings with clients is a very effective way to push for change in an institution like Goldman.


Was Greg Smith influenced by the OWS movement or by personal motivations?  Occupy would like to claim a small victory but the mindset of the average Wall Street executive is not akin to Mahatma Gandhi or any other seeker of justice for the masses.  In other words, Smith was doing his whining for his own 'spoiled brat' reasons and he paid no heed to justice for all or to tearing down a corrupt institution...

Source:
 http://www.nationofchange.org/lesson-defection-goldman-sachs-1334409931

A Lesson in Defection From Goldman Sachs | NationofChange

Goldman Sachs executive Greg Smith quit his job and, to massive fanfare, penned a New York Times op-ed denouncing what his company has become. 

With those 1,300 words, Goldman’s stock price dropped 3.4 percent, vanishing more than $2 billion from its worth and necessitating a commiserative house call from the mayor of New York.
(The damage was not permanent and the stock bounced back the next day.  But Smith sold lots of newspapers and got tongues wagging and fingers pointing and people speculating about the state of his sanity.)


Smith didn’t really echo any of the Occupy movement’s concerns about
- Goldman’s habit of self-serving market manipulation, contributing to downturns from the Great Depression to the Great Recession, 
- or its present hijacking of the very political system tasked with regulating it
(The most egregious part of this scandal is the power given to former Goldman executives over the fate of the financial system and the way they used this power to bail out bankers, keep the prosecutors at bay and ignore the collapsing housing market that was sinking the middle class of America, etc.)
- or the massive “bailout” to "save the financial system from collapse.

Smith objected to the way that Goldman was putting its own interests before those of its clients. 

(Was he hoping to exonerate himself from these practices so he could take his clients with him on his next business incarnation?)
 

Historically, the climax of just about every story of effective civil resistance is the moment of defection — when some crucial segment of the old guard goes turncoat and throws down with the voice of the people: Soldiers refuse to fire, prisoners go free, politicians ditch the party line.
Greg Smith, whose utter devotion to Goldman Sachs’ supposed core values is the premise of his denouncement, is as true a believer as they come.

REPEAT:  Greg Smith is as true a believer as they come. 

And it is precisely these kinds of people  who can end up being the most likely and effective whistle blowers and the most crippling defectors, 
 the instant they’re forced to realize that their institution fails to live up to its own cherished values.
 Think about it for a moment, and this actually stands to reason. Of course we would be more likely to make sacrifices on behalf of values to which we’ve already committed our lives or careers, the values that our clients and subsidiaries and loved ones have heard us espouse for years.


Saul Alinsky noted this phenomenon. He wrote, in his Rules for Radicals:

Since the Haves publicly pose as the custodians of responsibility, morality, law, and justice (which are frequently strangers to each other), they can be constantly pushed to live up to their own book of morality and regulations. 
(Can't be done)
No organization, including organized religion, can live up to the letter of its own book. 
You can club them to death with their “book” of rules and regulations.

Zoom back, then, to Occupy. The movement’s usual mode of attack against corporations or police departments it doesn’t like is to shout slogans about how bad they are. One could argue that:

Greg Smith reminds us that there’s a better — and perhaps more nonviolent — way: 

If you want to get an institution to eat itself alive, don’t just denounce it altogether. Instead, find ways to make its most committed and loyal members consider whether the institution really lives up to its own cherished values, and let them do their thing. They’re the ones who can stir up far more trouble with far less effort than anyone on the outside ever could.



 The Other Argument:
When a company’s cherished values really are intolerable perhaps there’s no substitute for simply going into the streets and shutting it down.


OWS claims such an intolerable situation is:
(Goldman, protecting the wealth of the1%) 







Thursday, April 12, 2012

Debt, Definition of

Term of the Day

net debt

A standard for analyzing the degree of debt held by a company. This takes into account not just the total amount of debt that a company owes, but how much debt it has in relation to its assets. If a company has a large amount of debt, but a large reserve of cash, it is better able to handle its debt situation than a company which has a smaller amount of debt but very limited cash or assets. This is one aspect to think about when considering investing in a company. Formula: total debts minus cash and all other liquid assets.



source: 

InvestorWords.com



 

Warren Buffett Profits From Goldman Sachs Rejects, WSJ Says - Businessweek

Warren Buffett Profits From Goldman Sachs Rejects, WSJ Says - Businessweek

  • GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The
    • $115.93 USD
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett benefited from leveraged loans unloaded by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) (GS) traders, the Wall Street Journal reported...

This is a blog post on about an article that covers two of my favorite market movers and shakers, Warren Buffett and Goldman Sachs.

 Bloomberg reporting on a WSJ article and here is the link:
 http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-12/warren-buffett-profits-from-goldman-sachs-rejects-wsj-says

You have to conclude that these particular business people cannot make a move without the eyes of the world watching them. Washing each others dirty laundry is how one commentator described institutional investors' many transactions...


Rumor: SEC, Goldman to settle research case for $22 million: sources Reuters

 

"Exclusive: ... the settlement has not yet been made public."


SymbolPriceChange
GS115.930.00

SEC, Goldman to settle...


By Sarah N. Lynch and Aruna Viswanatha
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. securities regulators are preparing to announce that Goldman Sachs will pay $22 million to settle allegations the bank did not have adequate policies to prevent research from being passed inappropriately to preferred clients...

The Securities and Exchange Commission's case against Goldman is expected to be similar to one that the bank settled last year with Massachusetts securities regulators, several sources told Reuters.

The $22 million penalty will resolve charges by both 
- the SEC and 
- the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority...

... the settlement has not yet been made public.

The expected SEC settlement and the prior Massachusetts settlement come after a major 2003 settlement with Goldman and other Wall Street firms over conflict-of-interest allegations involving their research analysts.

The banks in 2003 collectively paid $1.4 billion to resolve claims that they issued overly optimistic research on companies to win their investment banking business.

Improper relationships between research and investment banking was again at issue in the 2011 Massachusetts settlement, when Goldman agreed to stop organizing private meetings of traders and stock analysts, known as "huddles."


Read More @ Source:
 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-sec-goldman-settle-research
(Reporting By Sarah N. Lynch and Aruna Viswanatha; Editing by John Mair)

Monday, April 9, 2012

We Need an Authentic Measure of Wealth


 “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed.”
- Mahatma Gandhi



The Mismeasure of Wealth | NationofChange
 

Anatha Duraiappah and Partha Dasgupta

 "As a whole, humanity has achieved unparalleled prosperity; great strides are being made to reduce global poverty; and technological advances are revolutionizing our lives, stamping out diseases, and transforming communication.”


The Measure of Wealth

http://www.nationofchange.org/mismeasure-wealth-1333891185
Despite many successes in creating a more integrated and stable global economy, a new report by the United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Global Sustainability 


 Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A Future Worth Choosing

 recognizes the current global order’s failure, even inability, to implement the drastic changes needed for true “sustainability.”

The Panel’s report presents a vision for a “sustainable planet, just society, and growing economy,” as well as 56 policy recommendations for realizing that goal. It is arguably the most prominent international call for a radical redesign of the global economy ever issued.

But, for all of its rich content, Resilient People, Resilient Planet is short on concrete, practical solutions.

 Its most valuable short-term recommendation – the replacement of current development indicators (GDP or variants thereof) with more comprehensive, inclusive metrics for wealth – seems tacked on almost as an afterthought.

Without quick, decisive international action to prioritize sustainability over the status quo, the report risks suffering the fate of its 1987 predecessor, the pioneering Brundtland Report, which introduced the concept of sustainability, similarly called for a paradigm shift, and was then ignored.



Resilient People, Resilient Planet opens by paraphrasing Charles Dickens: the world today is 

“experiencing the best of times, and the worst of times.” 

As a whole, humanity has achieved unparalleled prosperity; great strides are being made to reduce global poverty; and technological advances are revolutionizing our lives, stamping out diseases, and transforming communication.


On the other hand, inequality remains stubbornly high, and is increasing in many countries.  

Short-term political and economic strategies are driving consumerism and debt, which, together with global population growth – set to reach nearly nine billion by 2040 – is subjecting the natural environment to growing stress. 

By 2030, notes the Panel, “the world will need at least 50% more food, 45% more energy, and 30% more water – all at a time when environmental limits are threatening supply.”

Despite significant advances in the past 25 years, humanity has failed to conserve resources, safeguard natural ecosystems, or otherwise ensure its own long-term viability.
Can a bureaucratic report – however powerful – create change?
Will the world now rally, unlike in 1987, to the Panel’s call to “transform the global economy”?
In fact, perhaps real action is born of crisis itself. As the Panel points out,it has never been clearer that


 we need a paradigm shift to achieve truly sustainable global development.


The 2010 Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress echoed the current consensus among social scientists that 
we are mismeasuring our lives by using  per capita GDP as a yardstick for progress. 

We need new indicators that tell us if we are destroying the productive base that supports our well-being.

...working to find these indicators for its “Inclusive Wealth Report” (IWR), which proposes an approach to sustainability based on natural, manufactured, human, and social capital. ...to provide a comprehensive analysis of the different components of wealth by country, their links to economic development and human well-being, and policies that are based on social management of these assets.

The first IWR, which focuses on 20 countries worldwide, will be officially launched at the upcoming Rio+20 Conference in Rio de Janeiro.

Preliminary findings will be presented during the Planet under Pressure Conference in London in late March.

The IWR represents a crucial first step in transforming the global economic paradigm, by ensuring that we have the correct information with which to assess our economic development and well-being – and to reassess our needs and goals. 

While it is not intended as a universal indicator for sustainability, it does offer a framework for dialogue with multiple constituencies from the environmental, social, and economic fields.

The situation is critical. 

As Resilient People, Resilient Planet aptly puts it, “tinkering around the margins” will no longer suffice – a warning to those counting on renewable-energy technologies and a green economy to solve our problems. 

The Panel has revived the call for a far-reaching change in the global economic system.


 

ABOUT Partha Dasgupta


Partha Dasgupta is Professor of Economics at the University of Cambridge and Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. His most recent book is

"Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment".